Blondin v. Dubois (IV), 238 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2001)
- Docket Number
- No. 00-6066
- Published
- No
- Decision Date
- 2001-01-04
- Name of Court
- United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
- Opinion by
- Cabranes, Jose A
- Counsel for Petitioner
- Hausler, Sanford
- Counsel for Respondent
- Schwartz, Wendy H
- Counsel for Court
- Requesting State
- France
- Requested State
- United States of America
- Procedural History
-
See Blondin v. Dubois, 19 F. Supp.2d 123 (S.D.N.Y.1998), Blondin v. Dubois, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir.1999), Blondin v. Dubois, 78 F.Supp.2d 283 (S.D.N.Y.2000)
- Summary of Facts
-
Blondin v. Dubois, 19 F. Supp.2d 123 (S.D.N.Y.1998), Blondin v. Dubois, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir.1999), Blondin v. Dubois, 78 F.Supp.2d 283 (S.D.N.Y.2000)
- Defenses Raised
-
Hague Article 12: Child had become well-settled in the new environment
Hague Article 13b: Grave risk of harm to the child if returned to the petitioning country
Hague Article 13b: The court should find that the child has attained an age and degree of maturity at which it is appropriate to take into account the childs views, and the child objects to return to the requesting state
- Statutes Considered (ICARA)
- 11601(a)
- Articles Considered (Hague Convention)
- 12, 13, 19
- Cases Considered
- Blondin v. Dubois , 19 F.Supp.2d 123 (S.D.N.Y.1998); Blondind v. Dubois , 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir.1999) ; Blondin v. Dubois, 78 F.Supp.2d 283 (S.D.N.Y.2000); Cree v. Flores, 157 F.3d 762 (9th Cir.1998); Croll v. Croll , 229 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2000); Feder v. Evans- Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3d Cir. 1995); Friedrich v. Friedrich, 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996); Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998); Mackler Productions v. Cohen , 225 F.3d 136 (2nd Cir. 2000); Shalit v. Coppe , 182 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 1999); United States v. Thai, 29 F.3d 785 (2d Cir.1994); Walsh v. Walsh , 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000)
- Judicial Outcome or Order
- Return Order Denial Affirmed
- Posted
- 2006-09-08
Why this Project?
We are a team of individuals from various professional backgrounds who are dedicated to creating a comprehensive resource that will enable mothers, domestic violence advocates, attorneys and judges to better prepare themselves for Hague Convention cases in the United States' legal system.
